Главная Учебники - Разные НАК „НАФТОГАЗ УКРАЇНИ“. Річний звіт англійською (2018 рік)
поиск по сайту правообладателям
|
|
содержание .. 8 9 10 11 ..
155 154 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ANNUAL REPORT 2018 2018 To the Shareholder of Joint Stock Company “National Joint Stock Company “Naftogaz of Ukraine”: Report on the Audit of the Consolidated Financial Statements Qualified Opinion We have audited the consolidated financial statements of Joint Stock Company “National Joint Stock Company “Naftogaz of Ukraine” and its subsidiaries (the “Group”), which comprise the consolidated statement of financial position as at 31 December 2018, the consolidated statement of profit or loss, consolidated statement of comprehensive income, consolidated statement of changes in equity and consolidated statement of cash flows for the year then ended, and notes to the consolidated financial statements, including a summary of significant accounting policies. In our opinion, except for the effects on the corresponding figures of the matter described in the Basis for Qualified Opinion section of our report, the accompanying consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Group as at 31 December 2018, and its consolidated financial performance and its consolidated cash flows for the year then ended in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRSs”) and the preparation of the consolidated financial statements requirements of the Law of Ukraine “On accounting and financial reporting in Ukraine” (“Law on accounting and financial reporting”). Basis for Qualified Opinion As discussed in Note 22 to the consolidated financial statements until July 2018 the Group’s subsidiary JSC “Ukrgasvydobuvannya” had joint operation agreement with Misen Enterprises AB and LLC “Karpatygas”. The property, plant and equipment related to joint operation as at 31 December 2017 amounted to UAH 1,455,640 thousand were measured in the consolidated financial statements using the cost model, while the Group’s policy is to use revaluation model for its property, plant and equipment. This constitutes a departure from IFRS which requires the Group to use uniform accounting policies for similar items. We were unable to determine the effect of this departure on the carrying amount of property, plant and equipment related to this joint operation agreement and revaluation reserve as at 2017 and related effects on total comprehensive income for the year then ended. Our audit opinion on the consolidated financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2017 was modified accordingly. Our opinion on the current period’s consolidated financial statements is also modified because of the possible effects of these matters on the comparability of the current period’s figures and the corresponding figures. We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (“ISAs”). Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Consolidated Financial Statements section of our report. We are independent of the Group in accordance with the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants’ Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (the “IESBA Code”) together with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the consolidated financial statements in Ukraine, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements and the IESBA Code. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our qualified opinion. Emphases of Matters Operating environment We draw your attention to Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, which describes that the impact of the continuing economic crisis and political turmoil in Ukraine and their final resolution are unpredictable and may adversely affect the Ukrainian economy and the operations of the Group. Our opinion is not modified in respect of this matter. Disputes with JSC “Gazprom” We also draw your attention to Note 22 to the consolidated financial statements, which describes material uncertainty regarding the final resolution of the Arbitration process between the Group and JSC “Gazprom”. Our opinion is not modified in respect of this matter. Key Audit Matters Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgment, were of most significance in our audit of the consolidated financial statements of the current period. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the consolidated financial statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters. In addition to the matter described in the Basis for Qualified Opinion section, we have determined the matters described below to be the key audit matters to be communicated in our report. INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT Why the matter was determined to be a key audit matter How the matter was addressed in the audit Impairment of property, plant and equipment As discussed in Note 5 “Property, plant and equipment” to the consolidated financial statements during the year ended 31 December 2018 the Group recognized an impairment of its property, plant and equipment in the total amount of UAH 76,013,989 thousand. The Group determined the recoverable amount of the property, plant and equipment through preparation of value in use projections. Determining the recoverable amount requires management to make significant estimates concerning the future cash flows based on judgements and assumptions about future business prospect. Based on the above we determined the assessment of the expected recoverable amount of property, plant and equipment to be a key audit matter. Refer to Note 5 “Property, Plant and Equipment” as well as Note 27 “Critical accounting estimates and judgements” for further details. Trade accounts receivable IFRS 9 “Financial Instruments” (“IFRS 9”) has been adopted by the Group for the first time and is effective from 1 January 2018. The application of IFRS 9 has significant impact on the expected credit losses on trade accounts receivable. Estimate of provision for expected credit losses on trade accounts receivable involves application of complex methodology, use of management’s judgement and various assumptions. Taking into account the significance of the trade accounts receivable balance and high level of subjectivity of judgements and assumptions we considered measurement of expected credit losses on trade accounts receivable to be a key audit matter. Refer to the Note 9 “Trade account receivable” as well as Note 28 “Adoption of new or revised standards and interpretations” of the accompanying consolidated financial statements for further details. We obtained understanding of the Group’s policy, processes and control procedures for measurement of expected credit losses on trade accounts receivable. We assessed the Group’s methodology on the expected credit losses calculation on a collective basis and its consistency with the requirements of IFRS 9. We tested the Group’s historical data based on a sample of trade accounts receivable and performed alternative recalculations of expected credit losses that are determined on a collective basis. We also assessed the appropriateness of management’s judgment regarding assessment of risk of default, the historical period for which statistics can be used for calculating the probability of default and loss given default for the expected credit losses that are assessed on a collective basis. We checked completeness and accuracy of the relevant disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Based on the results of our tests, we have not identified any signifi- cant issues. We obtained an understanding of the revenue arrangements in place across the Group. We reviewed the revenue recognition accounting policy, and checked whether it complies with IFRS 15 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers”. We assessed the key judgements made in respect of the revenue recognition criteria per IFRS 15 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” based on the prior experience of the Group and infor- mation available from the market. We challenged the probability of collectability of consideration by analyzing whether the Group historically collected consideration, to which it was entitled in exchange for the rendered services, as well as understanding the status of litigation over unsettled accounts receivable both for the portfolio of contracts with similar character- istics and in certain cases on individual basis. We evaluated the completeness and accuracy of the disclosures included in the consolidated financial statements. Based on the results of our tests, we have not identified any signifi- cant issues. We obtained, understood, and evaluated the Group’s policies, pro- cesses, methods and assumptions used to assess the recoverable amount of property, plant and equipment. With the involvement of our valuation experts we performed the fol- lowing procedures in respect of the recoverable amount assessment: • evaluated the identification of the cash-generating units; • evaluated whether the methodology applied and the model used is in line with the IFRS requirements; • challenged the assumptions applied in the determination of the discount rate and accuracy of its calculation; • challenged management’s judgements and analyzed validity of the assumptions and accuracy of projected cash flows used in the model; assessed their consistency with plans approved by management and with our accumulated knowledge of the Group and the industry in which they operate; • checked that the results were correctly recognized and presented in the consolidated financial statements; • assessed the completeness and correctness of the information dis- closed in the consolidated financial statements. Based on the results of our tests, we have not identified any significant issues.. Revenue recognition from balancing services The Group implemented for the first period of application of IFRS 15 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers”. This standard requires as part of identification of the contract to assess whether it is probable to collect the consideration from customers. Taking to account that balancing services are not settled in a full amount, recognition of respective revenues requires to make significant estimates in respect of future cash flows and management judgement. Based on the above we determined the revenue recognition from balancing services to be a key audit matter. Refer to Note 3 “Segment information” and Note 27 “Critical accounting estimates and judgements” of the accompanying consolidated financial statements for further details. |