НАК „НАФТОГАЗ УКРАЇНИ“. Річний звіт англійською (2018 рік) - 1

 

  Главная      Учебники - Разные     НАК „НАФТОГАЗ УКРАЇНИ“. Річний звіт англійською (2018 рік)

 

поиск по сайту            правообладателям  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

содержание      ..       1      2      ..

 

 

НАК „НАФТОГАЗ УКРАЇНИ“. Річний звіт англійською (2018 рік) - 1

 

 

2017                   2018

2017                   2018

2017                   2018

2017                   2018

2017                   2018

2017                   2018

2017                   2018

2017                   2018

2017                   2018

2017                   2018

2017                   2018

2017                   2018

REVENUES 

1

ASSETS

2

NOPLAT 

3

 

Integrated

gas

Oil midstream

and  downstream

Gas transit

Gas domestic

transmission

Gas

storage

Ukrnafta

Other

118.4

137.8

73.9

72.3

1.0

1.8

27.0

36.1

1.4

1.4

211.0

96.3

190.0

200.0

162.1

30.0

21.6

8.6

11.0

189.0

29.0

6.7

10.4

-1.3

-2.7

-3.2

-0.9

-2.4

9.3

4.0

0.6

28.0

2017                   2018

27.6

27.2

2017                   2018

2017                   2018

11.3

13.0

15.0

30.2

2.0

0.9

18.3

28.8

NAFTOGAZ

FINANCIAL

RESULTS 

256.3

227.5

603.7

723.1

38.6

41.2

2017 

 2018

2017 

 2018

2017 

 2018

Net

profit

Dividend

payments for 2017

UAH billion

11.6

29.5

Tax

payments

109.1

Capital investments

(+80%) 

30.6

Net cash generated 

by operating activities

71.6

includes elimination of UAH 33.3 billion for operations within the group

unallocated assets  - UAH 25.3 billion

adjusted operating result net of income taxes

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

INTRODUCTION

Address of supervisory board chair ��������������������������������������������������������������������

6

CEO's address ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������

8

MARKET AND REFORMS 

Macroenvironment: a year of big challenges ���������������������������������������������������

12

Global gas market ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������

16

Global oil market �����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������

30

Unbundling ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������

36

Key regulatory changes ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������

40

OPERATIONS 

Naftogaz transformation �����������������������������������������������������������������������������������

48 

Integrated Gas Business Unit ����������������������������������������������������������������������������

52 

Oil Unit ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������

62 

Technical Business Enabling Unit ����������������������������������������������������������������������

68 

Gas transmission and Storage Business Delivery Unit �������������������������������������

76 

Gas Transit ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������

84  

Ukrnafta PJSC ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������

88  

New businesses� Energy service �����������������������������������������������������������������������

90  

Arbitration proceedings: Gazprom, Crimea, Ukrnafta �������������������������������������

9

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND CSR 

Report of Naftogaz supervisory board �������������������������������������������������������������

98 

Corporate governance ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������

105 

Key managers and their remuneration �����������������������������������������������������������

106  

Risk management at Naftogaz group �������������������������������������������������������������

108 

Human resources management ���������������������������������������������������������������������

112 

Health and safety ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������

118 

Interaction with local communities ����������������������������������������������������������������

124 

Investments in energy efficiency ��������������������������������������������������������������������

128 

Ecology and environment protection �������������������������������������������������������������

132 

Procurement management�����������������������������������������������������������������������������

142 

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  

Financial stability ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������

146

Key performance indicators in 2018

 �������������������������������������������������������������

148

Auditor’s qualifications and related comments ���������������������������������������������

152

Consolidated Financial Statements ����������������������������������������������������������������

153

Independent Auditor’s Report ������������������������������������������������������������������������

154

Consolidated statement of financial position�������������������������������������������������

158

Consolidated statement of profit or loss ��������������������������������������������������������

159

Consolidated statement of comprehensive income ��������������������������������������

160

Consolidated statement of changes in equity ������������������������������������������������

161

Consolidated statement of cash flows������������������������������������������������������������

162

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 

Determination of the content and the 

material topics of the report ��������������������������������������������������������������������������

210

Material topics under GRI Standard  ��������������������������������������������������������������

212

Terms and abbreviations ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������

217

Contacts  ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������

218

CONTENTS

3

2

2018

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

7

6

ADDRESS  

OF SUPERVISORY  

BOARD CHAIR

It is great privilege for me to chair 

Naftogaz supervisory board in such a 

difficult and important period for both 

the company and Ukraine� 

I had hoped to be part of crucial reforms 

to improve the quality of life for tens of 

millions of people and to enhance the 

energy security of a young democracy 

fighting for its independence. The job 

carries huge responsibilities.

The board’s key priority is to help 

Naftogaz create great wealth for the 

Ukrainian people. To do that, we need 

professional management and immunity 

to political interference.

Over the past few years, Naftogaz has 

become a showcase of successful reforms 

in a big Ukrainian state-owned company� 

Naftogaz was the first state-owned 

company to obtain an independent 

supervisory board and swiftly progressed 

from a loss-generating black hole to the 

biggest taxpayer�

Unfortunately, these reforms have 

recently been largely reversed� This 

reversal puts at risk the great strides 

Naftogaz has been making in ensuring 

it is internationally competitive and is 

maximizing the value of its assets.

The government needs to reinstate good 

corporate governance at Naftogaz and 

then safeguard those achievements 

and make the changes irreversible� To 

do this, OECD recommendations on the 

corporate governance reform at Naftogaz 

should be implemented�

In its report State-Owned Enterprise 

Reform in the Hydrocarbons Sector 

in Ukraine issued in 2019, the OECD 

highlighted a number of positive changes 

in Ukraine, including the following:

•  enacting the natural gas market 

law, which aimed to facilitate the 

implementation of the Third energy 

Package and other elements of the EU 

acquis, and introducing transparent 

public service obligation (PSO) regime for 

categories of protected consumers; with 

plans to align gas prices with the market;

•  specifying a gas transit operator as 

part of its unbundling and certification 

requirements, while also introducing 

opportunities for more investment 

and private participation in the energy 

sector;

•  transforming the corporate governance 

of Naftogaz, including establishing the 

first-ever independent supervisory 

board using as a benchmark the OECD 

Guidelines on Corporate Governance 

of SOEs;

•  progressive upgrading of the SOE 

corporate governance frameworks, 

including independent board 

requirements and external 

independent audit; annual aggregate 

reporting by the state-owner; passing 

the long-awaiting Law “On privatization 

of state and communal property”; and 

professionalizing board nomination 

practices.

The OECD also notes that the Ukrainian 

government needs to make a series 

of important regulatory decisions to 

accomplish the corporate governance 

reform at Naftogaz. First and foremost, 

to empower the supervisory board with 

the necessary authority to carry out core 

functions of hiring/firing of CEO, approve 

strategy, financial and investment plans 

as well as to assign an appropriate 

level of operational autonomy to the 

executive board and the CEO. The latter 

includes eliminating the requirement 

for the government to approve business 

transactions in the presence of a proper 

system of internal controls�

For more effective governance, Naftogaz 

should have control over its assets, 

including those that are owned by fully-

owned subsidiaries. The organizational 

transformation of Naftogaz group 

with the transition from separate legal 

entities to business divisions will ensure 

relevant functions are not duplicated in 

individual subsidiaries and facilitate the 

implementation of best international 

practices in finance, human resource, 

strategy, legal, IT and other functions.

Every year’s production depletes 

our oil and gas fields. To maintain 

production requires new investment, 

and increasing production requires 

additional investment on top.  With the 

government’s take of Naftogaz profits, 

which was 50% in 2017, rose to 75% 

in 2018 and is proposed to be 90% in 

2019 the company cannot fund the 

level of investment required even to 

maintain production. It can only get the 

funds necessary to invest in increasing 

production from external sources. Recent 

deterioration in Naftogaz’s charter and 

its new dependence on government 

make the said sources somewhat less 

accessible, though this funding option 

remains top priority for production 

increase�

Naftogaz’ transit contract with Gazprom 

terminates at the end of 2019�  There is 

no new contract currently in place� This 

means we have to plan for the worst-case 

scenario – the termination of Russian 

gas transit after 2019 – and design an 

emergency plan for complete loss of the 

transit revenue�  

In order to ensure domestic and 

international gas flows in 2020 we will 

require additional cushion gas. This 

requires capital to purchase more 

gas. Again, just as with investment for 

production, Naftogaz will need capital to 

enable it to buy the necessary gas� Gas 

will have to be purchased and come into 

storage over 2019 to be available for 

2020�

Since becoming Chair of Naftogaz su-

pervisory board I have taken personal 

responsibility to deliver TSO unbundling 

alongside our CEO, Andriy Kobolyev. To 

ensure everyone can hold Naftogaz to 

account we hold quarterly stakeholder 

meetings to report on progress. We are 

committed to delivering an unbundled 

TSO by June of this year, allowing time for 

the necessary legal and legislative actions 

to be out in place to ensure a fully un-

bundled TSO by 1 January 2020 when the 

current contract with Gazprom expires.

In order to maintain our ability to pursue 

our ongoing arbitration with Gazprom, 

which could be worth USD 10�4-14�8 

billion, it is important for Naftogaz to 

continue to have an economic interest 

in the assets of the TSO� This requires an 

ISO model for unbundling�

To be a true ISO it is essential for 

customers of the pipeline network that 

the new unbundled TSO treats them 

in the same non-discriminatory way as 

they would be treated if the TSO were in 

fact ownership unbundled. Naftogaz is 

committed to ensuring that this will be 

customers reality and we will work with 

the regulator to deliver this outcome�

TSO and SSO branches are already op-

erating within Ukrtransgaz; and the 

consortium of potential partners for the 

Ukrainian GTS has been formed. We ex-

pect secondees from the consortium to be 

embedded into the TSO well before June.  

The international consortium’s involve-

ment  is expected to continue into 2020 

which should help to ensure both good 

governance in the new unbundled TSO, 

and that the new TSO treats all customers 

in a non discriminatory way regardless of 

the economic interests in its assets�

For Naftogaz to continue generate profit 

and create value for its ultimate owner – 

the people of Ukraine – the government 

as a shareholder needs to ensure both 

the financial stability of the company 

and the company’s independence from 

government�

Without both these conditions, the 

company will not be able to borrow 

from international markets on beneficial 

terms. Without capital Naftogaz cannot 

deliver adequate levels of investments 

into upstream or fill underground gas 

storages before the winter season�

I am grateful for the immense support 

we get from Ukrainian reformers and 

international stakeholders in changing 

Naftogaz. The group’s success could be 

an important driver in the reform of 

the overall SOE sector in Ukraine and 

produce far-reaching implications for the 

society, citizens’ everyday life and other 

businesses�

Clare Spottiswoode

Supervisory board chair

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

9

8

CEO’S ADDRESS

Over the last five years, Ukraine has done 

more to reform its energy sector than 

during the entire previous period since 

independence in 1991. Naftogaz is an ex-

ample of these changes. Unlike in 2014, 

we no longer pose a threat to Ukraine's 

independence. Instead, the company is 

now central to safeguarding Ukraine’s 

energy security� 

Due to these changes, the Kremlin can no 

longer dictate to Ukraine over the avail-

ability of gas and heat in Ukrainian homes� 

The reliability of Ukraine’s gas transmis-

sion system has helped create a powerful 

international coalition in the fight against 

Russian aggression. Meanwhile, modern 

Western technologies have finally reached 

Ukraine, helping us to compensate natural 

declines and increase gas production.

Unlike many previous years, Naftogaz is 

now the largest contributor to the state 

budget and supports the Ukrainian gov-

ernment in their efforts to maintain mac-

rofinancial stability. 

We now face the challenge of preserving 

these achievements and unlocking the 

true potential of Naftogaz group. This 

challenge is crucial, especially as we look 

ahead to unbundling and the separation 

of gas transmission activities from Naf-

togaz group from 1 January 2020.

Our vision for the future 

Our objective is to transform Naftogaz 

from a highly bureaucratic structure into 

the most efficient energy company in the 

region. We aim to become flexible, con-

sumer-oriented and competitive in our 

key markets� The goal is to ensure that 

the value created by our group is clear 

and tangible for Ukrainian consumers� 

We strive to become a company that 

deserves to be admired� 

To reach these objectives, we launched 

the structural transformation of Naf-

togaz last year. We have thoroughly 

analyzed all group assets, risks and 

opportunities in the markets where we 

operate. We believe that in the event 

of successful transformation, Naftogaz 

can provide Ukraine with an additional 

5% of GDP annually and increase the 

company's value by USD 35 billion in the 

medium term�

From 2019, our units will be grouped 

into business units: Integrated Gas, Oil, 

Technical, Transmission and Storage 

and others� Specific goals and clear 

performance targets will be set for 

each division� Individual division man-

agers will be personally responsible for 

the operational and financial results of 

their division�

In order to be successful, we must be-

come the most attractive employer in 

Ukraine for gifted and ambitious profes-

sionals. We strive to be a transparent and 

trustworthy employer where personal 

responsibility is encouraged and where 

everybody adheres to the highest ethical 

standards� 

In pursuit of these goals, we aim to build 

a long-term partnership with leading 

international companies. This will help 

Naftogaz to integrate into the global 

economy, paving the way for our coun-

try’s continued integration. 

Why this is important 

First, transformation is a national priority. 

Given Naftogaz's size and the attention 

focused on the group, we have a unique 

opportunity to lead the way towards 

Ukraine's energy independence. We are 

sufficiently visible to become a model for 

reform, and to attract significant invest-

ment on reasonable terms� I regard this 

as both an opportunity and a responsibil-

ity for Naftogaz.

Second, Ukrainian society stands to ben-

efit directly from our success because 

we are a 100% state-owned company� By 

earning money for Ukraine, we help the 

government do more for all our compa-

triots� 

Third, the transformation process is also 

important for our customers. We provide 

gas and energy services, directly or indi-

rectly, to about 90% of Ukrainian homes. 

In the process of transformation, we plan 

to increase the number of customers 

we provide services. We strive to offer 

reliable delivery, transparent and fair 

rules, as well as high-quality service to 

Ukrainian consumers. Such service is still 

far too uncommon in the Ukrainian utility 

market�

And finally, successful transformation is 

also important for our team� It will allow 

them to work in an environment where 

quality is recognized and rewarded. This is 

an opportunity for each of us to take re-

sponsibility and to change the situation for 

the better. It is a chance to do something 

important for Ukraine while developing 

personally and growing professionally�  

How to reach our goals 

Making a success of this transformation 

requires considerable efforts. We plan to: 

•  Ensure a smooth and timely unbundling 

of the GTS operator, which will help 

Ukraine to maintain gas transit and im-

prove the efficiency of the domestic gas 

market

•  Continue developing gas extraction, 

both independently and together with 

international partners 

•  Achieve complete liberalization and 

transparency of the national gas market

•  Become a direct supplier of utilities. We 

aim to take advantage of our experience 

and position in the market to serve the 

end user without intermediaries, while 

at the same time making the utility mar-

ket more transparent and efficient

•  Enter the energy efficiency market. We 

plan to offer energy services to house-

holds that will help reduce inefficient 

energy use and decrease customer gas 

and heat expenditures

•  Enter the renewable energy market 

using our extensive infrastructure in an 

optimal way

•  Upgrade infrastructure by implementing 

the highest IT and automation stan-

dards, increasing operational efficiency, 

and developing our technical capacities. 

To achieve this, we need to tackle many 

issues, from implementation of large-

scale IT systems to small but important 

innovations that will improve the oper-

ations of our drilling, mining and trans-

port departments 

•  Comprehensively transform our orga-

nization, including systems, processes, 

culture and people. We are developing 

a new performance management sys-

tem that will attract and retain talented 

professionals, give them the opportu-

nity to demonstrate results and receive 

due recognition

•  Continue corporate governance reform 

in line with OECD recommendations 

so that decisions are made quickly, in a 

transparent way, and in the best inter-

ests of the company

We will continue to adhere to our core 

values of openness, fairness, courage and 

conscientiousness in everything we do. 

They will drive the changes in the group 

from the inside�

In addition to internal transformation, 

we need to reboot relations with the 

government and to enhance constructive 

cooperation with civil society and other 

stakeholders�

We are well aware that without this step, 

any further progress in the reforms initi-

ated at Naftogaz is impossible.

As early as in July 2019, we will have 

to deal with unprecedented challenges 

caused by a potential liquidity shortage.

In order to cope with these challenges, 

we need support and combined efforts 

of a wide range of stakeholders, in 

order to:

•  Change the rules of the game in the 

national gas market so that Naftogaz 

does not have to finance the failure to 

pay by some if its counterparties.

•  Ensure that Naftogaz is able to raise 

debt on attractive terms. Since 2014, 

our loan portfolio has decreased 6.6 

times and is currently unnaturally low 

for an oil and gas company�

•  Ensure high-quality unbundling and 

preserve gas transit through Ukraine�

I sincerely believe that by working 

together, being passionate about our 

business, open and accountable to 

each other, we are able to make a 

significant contribution to the develop-

ment of Ukraine and the well-being of 

its citizens. I am sure that together, we 

will make Naftogaz a better company 

and achieve results that Ukrainians can 

take pride in�

Andriy Kobolyev 

Chief Executive Officer

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

13

12

MARKET AND REFORMS

ANNUAL REPORT 2018

2018

MACROENVIRONMENT:  

A YEAR OF BIG CHALLENGES

At first glance, last year’s results i.e. the 

key macroeconomic indicators give no 

rise for pessimism. They appear to be the 

best in the last five-year period – since 

the Revolution of Dignity, the annexation 

of the Crimea, and the occupation of 

territories in eastern Ukraine:

•  GDP growth rate exceeded that of 2017 

by almost 0.8 percentage points.

•  Inflation, for the first time in 5 years, is 

not within the two-digit range, reaching 

a mark of 9.8%.

•  Gold and foreign exchange reserves, 

for the first time in the last five years, 

returned to USD 21 billion.

•  The unemployment rate according 

to ILO methodology, for the first time 

since 2013, was less than 9%.

•  Real average monthly salaries kept 

growing for the third consecutive year 

(+ 12.5% in 2018).

However, a more detailed analysis reveals 

that in 2019-2020, Ukraine will face a 

number of dangerous challenges to the 

economy, while the changes achieved 

by the end of 2018 are insufficient to 

confront them. In addition to risks related 

to the political election cycle, including 

parliamentary elections in October this 

year

1

, in 2019, the Ukrainian economy 

will face a number of significant external 

threats and unresolved old domestic 

problems. Primarily, this means Ukraine 

further lagging behind the global 

economy and the threat of an economic 

crisis due to the loss of transit in 2020:

•  The economy keeps on growing at rates 

below the growth rates of developing 

countries. In 2018, Ukraine's real GDP 

increased by 3.3%, while average 

growth rates in developing countries 

amounted to 4.5%. Ukraine is not 

reducing, but rather increasing the gap 

even compared with the neighbouring 

Eastern European countries, which 

grew by an average of 3.6%.

•  According to the IMF, the accumulated 

gap between the Ukrainian economy 

and the global economy is not expected 

to decrease: the average growth rate 

of Ukraine's economy in 2019-2024 

(3.1%) will be less than the growth 

rate in 2018, and also less than the 

global expected average growth rate 

(3.6%). As a result, even in 2024, the 

share of the Ukrainian economy in the 

global economy, according to the IMF 

forecast (0.18%) will not reach the level 

recorded in the period before 2014 

(0.23% in 2013). 

•  Even this non-optimistic forecast does 

not take into account the negative effect 

of the expected termination of transit 

in 2020, which will trigger an economic 

downturn [See. section "Gas transit"). 

According to our estimates, no revenues 

from transit will result in decrease in 

GDP by about 4%, with conservative 

estimations of any possible multiple 

effect. Since the IMF expects GDP growth 

in 2020 of only 3%, then if you subtract 

4% from the loss of transit, GDP will show 

a 1% drop. Therefore, if no compensation 

from Gazprom is received, the situation 

with the termination of transit will lead to 

an economic crisis in 2020. At the same 

time, it may lead to a shortage of gas in 

the country, which will further adversely 

affect both energy security and economic 

growth. In such a case, Ukraine would no 

longer be important for Europe as a gas 

transmission country to the European 

market, leading many experts to conclude 

that it will increase the threat of full-

scale military aggression by the Russian 

Federation

2

.

•  In addition to the negative effect 

of transit termination, another 

significant risk to the economy is the 

deterioration of external conditions 

due to the possible shift of the world 

economy to a downturn phase, 

which international experts

3

 warn 

about, as well as an increase in world 

commodity prices volatility. The risks 

of a more rapid downturn of the 

world economy have been increasing 

recently in the context of increasing 

geopolitical conflicts and "trade wars", 

uncertainty about Brexit, decreases in 

the growth rate of the Eurozone, and 

"deleveraging" the Chinese economy, 

together with increasing volatility in 

financial markets.

Another potential risk, often mentioned 

throughout 2018, is the period of peak 

1  

According to NBU survey in January 2019, 56% of respondents believed that presidential and parliamentary elections were a major challenge for Ukraine’s economy in 2019. Top 3 challenges 
also included protection of investors’ rights and freedom of entrepreneurship (19%) and the upcoming  peak of foreign debt repayment by Ukraine (13%).

2

 See, for example: https://www.rbc.ua/ukr/news/tranzit-gaza-cherez-ukrainu-sderzhivaet-agressiyu-1526099213.html 

3

 See, for example: https://www.theguardian.com/business/2018/dec/11/imf-financial-crisis-david-lipton

7.2%

9.3%

9.1%

9.3%

9.5%

8.8%

0.5%

24.9%

43.3%

12.4%

13.7%

9.8%

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

Unemployment rate according to ILO methodology (right axis), %
Inflation rate, % December-to-December (left axis)

Real GDP change rate, % (left axis)
International reserves by the end of December, USD billion (right axis)

Ukraine

Developing countries

European developing countries

World

Developed economies

Ukraine

Developing countries

European developing countries

World

Developed economies

0.0%

-6.6%

-9.8%

2.4%

2.5%

3.3%

0

5

10

15

20

25

-12%

-10%

-8%

-6%

-4%

-2%

0%

2%

4%

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

3.1%

4.8%

2.6%

3.6%

1.7%

3.3%

4.5%

3.6%

3.6%

2.2%

Inflation and unemployment rates in 2013-2018

GDP growth rates and size of international reserves

Actual real GDP growth in 2018

Average expected real GDP growth rates 

in 2019-2024 (according to the IMF)

foreign debt repayment. After Ukraine 

agreed with the IMF on a new stand-by 

credit program and received the first 

tranche under it, the experts began 

pointing out this problem much less 

often. However, the aforementioned 

potential slowdown in the world 

economy will directly and indirectly 

affect revenues to the state budget, 

in view how dependent Ukraine is 

on export earnings and the share of 

commodities in exports. In turn, a 

decrease in state budget revenues from 

export-oriented industries, as well as the 

risk of losing tax revenues associated 

with gas transit, may adversely affect 

the country’s capability to repay and 

service sovereign debt. 

GDP growth rate in 2020

0.00%

0.05%

0.10%

0.15%

0.20%

0.25%

0.30%

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024

2.99%

-1.01%

...according to IMF forecast

in case of termination of transit

In 2019

4.5%

In 2021

25.6%

Not in the next 5 years

18.8%

In 2020

51.1%

When do you expect the next global economic crisis? 

(% of the respondents’ replies)

Ukraine’s share in the global economy

Data: IMF, State Statistics Service of Ukraine, calculations of Naftogaz analytical department 

Data: NBU, State Statistics Service of Ukraine, calculations of Naftogaz analytical department 

Data: IMF, State Statistics Service of Ukraine, calculations of Naftogaz analytical department 

Data: IMF, State Statistics Service of Ukraine, calculations of Naftogaz analytical department 

Data: IMF, State Statistics Service of Ukraine, calculations of Naftogaz analytical department 

Data: IMF, calculations of Naftogaz analytical department 

Data: Results of the survey during the 9th CFA Society Ukraine Investment Forum

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

15

14

MARKET AND REFORMS

ANNUAL REPORT 2018

2018

The decline in oil prices, which is usually 

observed when the world economy 

slows down, entails lower prices for 

other commodities like grain, which is 

one of the main Ukrainian exports. As a 

result, the already high deficit of balance 

of trade, which is close to the pre-crisis 

figures for 2008 and 2013, may increase 

even more due to a possible fall in prices 

for export commodities produced in 

Ukraine. If these factors are combined 

with the loss of more than USD 2.5 billion 

in transit revenues, it is most likely that 

in the absence of significant inflows to 

the financial account of the balance 

of payments, a currency crisis will be 

triggered. 

In 2019, Ukraine remains exposed to the 

risks of further intensive labor migration 

with its negative impact on the level of 

skills of the labor force in a situation when 

wages and salaries are under pressure. 

According to experts, labor migration 

may be aggravated due to the plans of 

Germany

4

 and the Czech Republic

5

 to 

make employment conditions for foreign 

nationals more favorable.

Experts say that the effective allocation 

and use of available resources in the 

country, as well as creating conditions 

for more active involvement of direct 

international investors with their 

knowledge, technology and financial 

capital, is critically important in the 

current situation. These issues are 

interconnected and their solution will 

have a positive impact on macroeconomic 

indicators:

a)  attracting investors both with financial 

resources and relevant technical 

expertise would allow for the most 

effective deployment of Ukraine’s 

competitive advantages, since modern 

technologies enable more effective use 

of the resources available in the country; 

b)  new technologies that are available to 

international investors would help to 

cover the shortage of skilled labor force;

c)  attracting well-known international 

investors in various sectors, including 

in the oil and gas sectors, would 

contribute to a reduction in the risk of 

full-scale military aggression by Russia;

d)  direct investments would cover part 

of foreign currency deficit that will 

arise due to possible lack of gas transit 

revenues.

For example, the hypothetical loss of 

gas transit revenues could be offset 

by the development of Ukraine’s own 

gas production and energy efficiency

6

 

improvements. As factual data reveals 

this scenario is difficult to achieve, so 

Naftogaz, in order to increase the chances 

of success, can become a platform to 

attract international investors to specified 

segments. As the world practice shows 

that the major international players in 

the oil and gas market are very cautious 

about investing in the Ukrainian economy 

on their own and need a strong and 

trustworthy local partner.

4

 See https://www.dw.com/cda/uk/на-роботу-до-німеччини-що-зміниться-з-майбутнім-міграційним-законом /a-46803394

See https://politeka.net/ua/news/economics/878330-chehija-gotovit-zakon-o-trudoustrojstve-ukraincev-polsha-ne-nuzhna/ 

Along with the elimination of corruption schemes in retail gas supply through the market liberalization according to European rules

0

100

200

300

400

500

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

2027

2028

2029

Domestic debt

Foreign debt

Scheduled sovereign debt repayments as of 01.04.2019, UAH billion

-14.4

-2.0

-4.0

-10.1

-14.3

-15.6

-4.6

-2.4

-6.5

-8.6

-11.2

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

Balance of goods and services, USD billion

Data: Ministry of Finance of Ukraine

Data: NBU

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

17

16

MARKET AND REFORMS

2018

ANNUAL REPORT 2018

 TWh

2016
2017
2018
2019

Jan

uar

y

Febr

ua

ry

M

ar

ch

Ap

ril

May

Jun

e

Jul

y

Augu

st

Sep

temb

er

Oc

tob

er

No

vemb

er

De

cemb

er

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

 kWh/d

EUR/

MW

-h

10

12

14

16

18

20

22

24

26

28

30

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

Volumes in 2017 (left axis)

Volumes in 2018 (left axis)

NCG hub price in 2018 (right axis)   

April

May

June

July

August

September

October

Change in European UGS reserves in 2016-2019

Injection into European UGS in 2017-2018

-10%

-17%

 kWh/d

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

5000

January 2017

February 2017

Mar

ch 2017

April 2017

Ma

y 2017

June 2017

July 2017

August 2017

Sep

tember 2017

Oct

ober 2017

No

vember 2017

December 2017

January 2018

February 2018

Mar

ch 2018

April 2018

Ma

y 2018

June 2018

July 2018

August 2018

Sep

tember 2018

Oct

ober 2018

No

vember 2018

December 2018

January 2019

February 2019

Nord Stream

Mallnov (Yamal-Europe)

Uzhgorod-Velké Kapušany

Transit flows from Russia in 2017-2019

GLOBAL GAS MARKET

One of the key events at the beginning of 

2018, producing an impact on the market 

throughout the year, was the sharp rise in 

prices against the backdrop of anomalous 

cold spell due to the anticyclone from 

Siberia (Beast from the East). During 

the week of late February – early 

March 2018, prices in European hubs 

temporarily increased by several times. 

At the German NCG, the average daily 

price jumped from around € 20 / MWh to 

€ 70 / MWh.

Since the beginning of February 2018, 

the natural gas consumption rate 

by households in the countries of 

Northwest Europe

1

 was higher than the 

average consumption rate for the same 

period in 2016 and 2017 and increased 

significantly at the end of February. A 

10° C drop in temperature below normal 

average for that time of year, while UGS 

stocks were seasonally runout, reduced 

available resources to cover the growing 

demand by several times. 

Beast from the East 

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

01

.0

2

03

.0

2

05.

02

07.

02

09

.0

2

11.0

2

13

.0

2

15

.0

2

17.

02

19

.0

2

21

.0

2

23

.0

2

25

.02

27.

02

01

.0

3

03

.03

05.

03

07.

03

09

.0

3

11.0

3

13

.0

3

15

.0

3

17.

03

19

.0

3

21

.0

3

23

.0

3

25

.0

3

27.

03

29

.0

3

31

.0

3

Actual consumption in 2018
Average consumption in 2016-2017
Maximum consumption in 2016-2017

 kWh/d

January 2018

February 2018

Mar

ch 2018

April 2018

Ma

y 2018

June 2018

July 2018

August 2018

Sep

tember 2018

Oct

ober 2018

No

vember 2018

December 2018

January 2019

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

EUR/

МW

-h

Change in natural gas price in 2018-2019, NCG hub

Gas consumption by households in Northwest Europe 

1

 Calculated based on household consumption data for Germany, France, Belgium and Holland sourced from Thomson Reuters.

Source: Thomson Reuters Eikon

Source: Thomson Reuters Eikon

Source: Ukrtransgaz

3

  On 2-3March 2018, the pressure at the entrance to Ukraine’s  GTS from Russia remained critically law. For example, at Suja gas metering station, it was 50-51 kgf/cm

2

, while the contractual pressure is 

60-65 kgf/cm

2

: http://utg.ua/utg/media/news/2018/03/gazproms-actions-has-provoked-an-emergency-in-a-stable-gas-transit-to-eu-countries.html 

Furthermore, Russian gas supply 

to Europe was very low in January 

and early February 2018. Unlike 

the Ukrainian route, other routes 

for Russian gas transit to Europe 

(the Yamal and the Nord Stream gas 

pipelines) operated at maximum 

capacity. Therefore, demand for natural 

gas in Slovakia, the Czech Republic and 

Italy was partially satisfied by exports 

from Germany. With a sharp drop in air 

temperature, the distribution of transit 

flows changed significantly. Since only 

Ukraine’s transit route has sufficient 

capacity and flexibility, gas transmission 

through the Ukrainian GTS began 

to increase gradually and reached 

155 mcm per day at the Uzhgorod / 

Velke Kapushani point by the end of 

March, which was almost three times 

higher than in early February

2

.

Besides the mentioned change in 

transit flows, the surge in prices caused 

by the unusual drop in temperature 

affected the Ukrainian market even 

more because of a gas shortage during 

the said period. At the end of February 

2018, Naftogaz made a prepayment 

to Gazprom for gas that should have 

been delivered in March 2018 under 

the Stockholm arbitration award in 

the supply case. However, the Russian 

side again decided to use gas as a 

"political weapon", and Gazprom did 

not supply the pre-paid gas to Naftogaz. 

This caused a critical situation with 

gas supply to consumers in Ukraine, 

and Naftogaz had to urgently purchase 

natural gas from European countries 

to replace the Russian gas that had not 

been supplied. During the period of 

sharp cooling, increasing consumption 

and reducing trans-border gas flows in 

Europe, Naftogaz suffered losses due to 

the increased purchase price. 

The threat of a disruption in the heating 

season that arose because of Gazprom’s 

failure on both gas supply and transit 

contracts

3

 was eliminated thanks to 

the rapid purchase of gas in Europe, an 

increase in the volume of natural gas 

withdrawal from UGS, and the flexibility 

of Ukraine's pipeline system.

Impact on the Ukrainian market

15

.0

2.

20

18

16

.0

2.

20

18

17

.0

2.2

01

8

18

.0

2.

20

18

19

.0

2.

20

18

20.0

2.

20

18

21

.0

2.

20

18

22.

02.2

01

8

23

.0

2.2

01

8

24

.0

2.2

01

8

25

.0

2.

20

18

26

.0

2.

20

18

27

.0

2.

20

18

28

.0

2.

20

18

01

.0

3.

20

18

02

.0

3.

20

18

03

.0

3.

20

18

04

.0

3.

20

18

05

.0

3.

20

18

06

.0

3.

20

18

07

.0

3.

20

18

08

.0

3.

20

18

09

.0

3.

20

18

10.0

3.

20

18

11

.0

3.

20

18

12

.0

3.

20

18

13

.0

3.

20

18

14

.0

3.

20

18

15

.0

3.

20

18

62% 62% 60% 59% 60% 61% 62% 62% 64% 61% 62% 63%

64%

65%

70% 69%

60%

60% 59% 59%

54% 51% 50%

47% 45%

39%

43%

47% 46%

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

m

cm

Gas from UGS (right axis)

Import (right axis)

Own production (right axis)

Share of gas from UGS in supply (left axis) 

Sources of gas supply to Ukrainian consumers in February-March 2018

Europe closed the winter heating season 

at a record low level of gas reserves in UGS 

facilities. Gas demand should have therefore 

remained rather high during the summer 

season to ensure maximum replenishment of 

UGS reserves.

Right after the end of the heating season, 

market participants maximized injec-

tion into underground storage facilities. 

The injection rate in April-May 2018 

increased by 35% compared to the same 

period of 2017, and the highest injection 

rate was recorded in May 2018.

Source: Gas Infrastructure Europe (GIE), AGSI+

Source: Gas Infrastructure Europe (GIE), AGSI+, Thomson Reuters

The expected increase in injection into the 

UGS facilities contributed to the growing 

demand and consequently boosted spot 

prices with spread tightening under the 

contracts with delivery in summer to the 

prices of the contracts with delivery in 

winter 2018/2019.

Market after the March shock

2

 According to ENTSOG, Thomson Reuters.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

19

18

MARKET AND REFORMS

2018

ANNUAL REPORT 2018

Change in trend

Source: Thomson Reuters, in-house calculations

April

May

June

July

August

September

October

NCG hub price in 2017  (01.04.2017 = 100%)   
NCG hub price in 2018  (01.04.2018 = 100%) 

80%

90%

100%

110%

120%

130%

140%

150%

160%

Relative price change at the NCG hub  

during gas-injection season 2017 and 2018

As of the start of the gas off-take season 

in Europe (October 2018), total gas 

stocks were almost 2 bcm less against the 

same period in 2017. Meanwhile, higher 

temperatures throughout continental 

Europe in November-December 2018 

and the extension of the injection period 

made UGS stocks as of 31 December 

2018 almost 6 bcm higher than in 2017. 

These factors, combined with increased 

LNG supplies in the second half of 

2018 and the situation in other energy 

markets, became drivers for lower gas 

prices.

The change in volumes of LNG supplies 

to the European market needs a more 

detailed discussion. Starting from 

Q4 2018, after the launch of new transfer 

lines at LNG terminals in Yamal in Russia, 

Ichthys in Australia, and Sabine Pass and 

Corpus Christi in the US, supply on the 

LNG market gradually increased. At the 

same time, moderate temperatures in 

Asian regions at the beginning of the 

winter season and a rather comfortable 

level of gas stocks led to a decrease in 

demand and prices. In addition, the 

specified period demonstrated a record 

high freight rates for LNG shipping. All 

of these factors led to the redirection of 

LNG freight flows from the Asia-Pacific 

region to Europe.  

The comfortable level of resource supply 

to the European market and higher 

than normal temperatures impacted on 

natural gas prices.

In general, the change in natural gas 

prices in the European market during the 

injection season 2018 had an upward 

trend, which, in addition to the above 

factors, was due to the following:

-  a decrease in LNG imports in the 

summer due to high premiums on Asian 

markets compared with the price of 

natural gas in Europe;  

-  a gradual increase in oil and coal prices, 

as well as the prices for European 

quotas for greenhouse gas emissions;

-  low water levels in the main shipping 

rivers of Europe, which made the 

prompt delivery of coal to coal-fired 

plants impossible.

 bc

m

Jan

uar

y

Febr

ua

ry

Mar

ch

April

M

ay

June

July

August

Sep

tember

Oct

ober

No

vember

December

2017

2018

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

EU

R/

M

W

-h

0,0

5,0

10,0

15,0

20,0

25,0

30,0

Ap

ril 2

01

8

M

ay 2

01

8

Ju

ne  2

01

8

Ju

ly 2

01

8

Au

gu

st  2

01

8

Sep

temb

er

 2

01

8

Oc

to

be

r 2

01

8

No

ve

m

be

r 2

01

De

cemb

er

 2

01

8

Ja

nu

ar

y 2

01

9

Fe

br

ua

ry 2

01

9

Average price at NCG hub, summer 2018  
Average price at NCG hub, winter 2018 - 2019  

Average monthly price at NCG hub 

- 9 EUR/MW-h 

LNG imports to Europe in 2017-2018

Price change at NCG hub in summer-winter 2018-2019

The volume of transit in 2018 amounted 

to 86.8 bcm, which is 6.7 bcm (or 7.2%) 

less than in 2017.

The transit flow decreased unevenly by 

exit points – about 65% or 4.3 bcm of 

total decline in transit volume was due 

to a decrease in transmission to Slovakia 

(due to more intensive use of Nord 

Stream).

The volumes of transit flows in 2018 

were higher than those of 2017 in only 

two periods – during a cold snap in 

March 2018, and during the maintenance 

of the Yamal and the Nord Stream 

pipelines in July 2018. In Q1 2018, the 

Nord Stream became the main route for 

supplying Russian gas to the EU (36% of 

total supply), slightly exceeding transit 

through Ukraine (34%)

4

.

In 2018, the Russian Federation and 

its partners made a number of steps 

towards the implementation of the 

Nord Stream 2 project and its land 

extension – the EUGAL pipeline. Gazprom 

is also implementing TurkStream – a 

gas pipeline project that runs through 

the Black Sea to Turkey and will have 

two strings with a total capacity of 

31.5 bcm / year, which threatens to stop 

transit through Ukraine in the southern 

direction.

Gas transit through Ukraine

bcm

62.2

67.1

82.2

93.5

86.8

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

Transit volume 

Change compared to previous year

8%

23%

14%

-7%

Volumes of natural gas transit through Ukraine in 2014-2018

bcm

53.5

20.2

11.7

4.7

2.7

0.7

49.2

18.1

11.8

4.0

2.9

0.7

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Uzhgorod

(Slovakia)

Orlovka

(Romania)

Berehove

(Hungary)

Drozdovychi

(Poland)

Moldova

Tekove

(Romania)

2017

2018

Distribution of transit flows by exit points in 2017-2018

mc

m/da

y

January

February

Mar

ch

April

M

ay

June

July

August

Sep

tember

Oct

ober

No

vember

December

100

150

200

250

300

350

2017

2018

Change gas volumes via the Ukrainian GTS in 2017-2018

4

 EC Quarterly report on European Gas Markets issue 1, quarter 

of 2018

Source: Thomson Reuters

Source: Ukrtransgaz

Source: Ukrtransgaz

Source: Ukrtransgaz

Source: Thomson Reuters

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

содержание      ..       1      2     ..